Lol, I was hoping that setting the non-naive resolution would mean that I have the projectors doing the work of AA rather than the GPU. Again my cheapo way of trying to set this up!
is there a significant risk that 2400x600 in 3d (ie maintaining at least 60fps) will be too much for a 460 sli set up?
That's my main worry. If the odds are that it can't manage that then I may have to get 480 sli although I really don't want to as that will significantly increase the cost. Double the amount spent on graphics and I will have to get a new PSU! :(
What d'you guys think?
With 3D, you'd need it ideally keeping at least 80fps, as that's 40fps per eye, sort of thing. In effect. Kinda. I don't see why it shouldn't, to be honest. I've got GTX460s driving a res
five times higher (in pixel count terms - 6064x1200) than that and they do OK. In some games they're a little close to my 'minimum', but for most of the games I've tested so far, they do great. I cannot see GTX460s for a minute doing badly at 2400x600. In fact, I'd say at that res, the CPU and PCI-E bus become bottlenecks rather than the GPUs... at least in 2D. It'd probably even out in 3D.
Login
FAQ
Search
Members
