Also even in the case where a website is supposed to be "shady" and "unaffiliated" , you can't expect everyone to be 100% aware of it,
for example when I was younger I was recommended a local store for buying computers. I bought from it, got a case which was damaged upon receipt, got it changed, got an AMD processor who burnt, which was replaced, and got an oem ATI graphic card 8500 which a few weeks later happened to be a 8500LELE (when I found the tools to detect frequencies). and then the shop owner just refused to take it back and said that I was the equivalent of a "small dickhead" in french. Got screwed & ATI support ignored my purchase because of OEM status, and a year after the purchase the 8500LELE stopped functioning (artifacts in the BIOS)
What I mean is that even though now I probably am old & wise enough to be very mindful of where I buy, it's not the case for everyone, and one shouldn't
always be blamed for making the wrong decision. One shouldn't always assume that the user knowingly made a bad decision.
Basically I just don't like how it really shows a move towards the games as a service thing. They can now control WHERE you can play a game. (Consoles have region protection, but that just requires you to own a console of the same region. PC's have never been affected by this until now...)
ho yeah I so agree with that.
I think it's fine to deactivate 100% illegal keys, after all the devs/producers didn't get any money from the transaction, even though the one screwed is the user (in the cases where the user thought he bought something legal)
but in this particular case, it's a way to put pressure on the import resellers
whereas depending on country the producer doesn't always have the legal right to impose his price...
so in the end what activision's doing might just be borderline illegal