[quote]The game, if one can allow oneself to enjoy it, is a very entertaining piece of interactive fiction.
Its not a highly technical game as far as aiming like bf2.
Its not an uber graphics hog like crysis.
I think the way the meshed the diaries with the overall ambience and scenery was like nothing i'd ever seen before in a game.
Cynicism kills bioshock, but enjoyed it can be.
It's really not that innovative when you've played System Shock 2, but I'm guessing many of the XBOX 360 users never have so that's probably why they lapped it up.
I have to say I did enjoy it for a while, but I lost patience, I don't usually pay £30 on a game just to hate on it, but I can't find anything really redeeming in BioShock. IMO they spent far too much time on insignificant details right down to some nonsense about the philosphy of objectivism, that they forgot they were making a game.
Some basics were completely missed, coupled with the fact its been 83 days with no sign of an update barring an activation revoke tool (don't even get me started), numerous awful Big Daddy halloween costumes and a sh*t soundtrack. woo.
Gotta say I mostly agree with superman here. I mean, it was billed as an FPS-RPG.
You what?
FPS, sure. RPG, no frickin' way in
hell.
A light/dark choice that only has one real effect does not an RPG make.
If Bioshock was an RPG, then the definition of RPG has been vastly mauled in the last year.
And... actually, while I'd say it wasn't 'technical' in the way BF2 was/is... I'd definitely say that it was a system hog at the time. It still is, it's just that it's been superceded by the even bigger system hog that is Crysis. ;)