That's some nice benchmarking!
I think it's save to say there is no need to upgrade if you already own an Titan X Pascal.
And yes, I'll just keep waiting for VEGA
| Widescreen Gaming Forum http://www.wsgf.org/phpBB3/ |
|
| GeForce Titan X (Pascal) vs. Titan Xp [Surround] http://www.wsgf.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=32047 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | scavvenjahh [ 17 Apr 2017, 16:13 ] |
| Post subject: | GeForce Titan X (Pascal) vs. Titan Xp [Surround] |
A quick look at the top dogs through three games on an old-ass system. Come and read decimals while you wait for Vega ! CPU: i7-4930K @ 4 GHz (HT off: 6C/6T) RAM: 16 GB DDR3 1066 MHz OS: Windows 7 x64 SP1 Storage: system & games on Samsung SSD 850 Pro 2 TB Display: Acer Predator XB271HU (2560x1440, 144 Hz), Surround resolution 7800x1440. - nvidia driver 381.65, room temp 20C/68F, MSI Afterburner running in the background the whole time. - I play a game for half an hour to warm things up, then run each benchmark 3 times and report results for the third run. - I then push the GPU's power limit to 120% and run the tests again. Typical card behavior during benchmark: Titan X (Pascal), core clock: around 1600-1700 MHz, temp 83C/181F, fan 50% Titan X (Pascal) 120%, core clock: steady 1747 MHz, temp 87C/189F, fan 65% Titan Xp, core clock: 1780-1820 MHz, temp 80C/176F, fan 49% Titan Xp 120%, core clock: steady 1835 MHz, temp 85C/185F, fan 53% GTA 5 *Titan X (Pascal), default Frames Per Second (Higher is better) Min, Max, Avg Pass 0, 32.314178, 57.703213, 47.008301 Pass 1, 32.614784, 55.813625, 39.852509 Pass 2, 27.080118, 141.272446, 44.047409 Pass 3, 32.064522, 138.156830, 49.694935 Pass 4, 19.403578, 82.770798, 44.027740 *Titan X (Pascal), power limit 120% Frames Per Second (Higher is better) Min, Max, Avg Pass 0, 35.314354, 58.096989, 47.911297 Pass 1, 35.021942, 60.603905, 40.572536 Pass 2, 32.323303, 137.254440, 44.525322 Pass 3, 39.107929, 137.841370, 50.652382 Pass 4, 24.065590, 89.454277, 46.151413 *Titan Xp, default Frames Per Second (Higher is better) Min, Max, Avg Pass 0, 31.670277, 58.295906, 48.959423 Pass 1, 30.466002, 60.945431, 41.955791 Pass 2, 32.102657, 147.767365, 45.580563 Pass 3, 34.942329, 146.154190, 52.377296 Pass 4, 24.704124, 145.100296, 47.794594 *Titan Xp, power limit 120% Frames Per Second (Higher is better) Min, Max, Avg Pass 0, 31.024837, 62.661552, 50.017807 Pass 1, 31.313932, 53.853645, 42.536961 Pass 2, 34.137909, 144.676682, 46.143635 Pass 3, 37.515789, 152.113663, 52.389233 Pass 4, 24.260960, 144.733429, 48.742058 Rise of the Tomb Raider *Titan X (Pascal), default Mountain Peak 57.21 fps Syria 43.22 fps Geothermal Valley 40.73 fps Overall score 47.28 fps *Titan X (Pascal), power limit 120% Mountain Peak 59.97 fps Syria 46.44 fps Geothermal Valley 44.45 fps Overall score 50.51 fps *Titan Xp, default Mountain Peak 61.60 fps Syria 48.19 fps Geothermal Valley 45.99 fps Overall score 52.15 fps *Titan Xp, power limit 120% Mountain Peak 62.79 fps Syria 49.77 fps Geothermal Valley 47.61 fps Overall score 53.60 fps Tom Clancy's The Division *Titan X (Pascal), default Avg FPS 46.0 CPU 45% GPU 96% *Titan X (Pascal), power limit 120% Avg FPS 48,6 CPU 46% GPU 96% *Titan Xp, default Avg FPS 50.7 CPU 46% GPU 97% *Titan Xp, power limit 120% Avg FPS 52.3 CPU 47% GPU 96% |
|
| Author: | Eneko [ 19 Apr 2017, 12:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GeForce Titan X (Pascal) vs. Titan Xp [Surround] |
That's some nice benchmarking! I think it's save to say there is no need to upgrade if you already own an Titan X Pascal. And yes, I'll just keep waiting for VEGA
|
|
| Author: | Haldi [ 23 Apr 2017, 02:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: GeForce Titan X (Pascal) vs. Titan Xp [Surround] |
Thanks for all the testing
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|