quad setup WORKS
| Widescreen Gaming Forum http://www.wsgf.org/phpBB3/ |
|
| 8400 x 1050 possibility? //edit - WORKS @ page 2 http://www.wsgf.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=19049 |
Page 2 of 6 |
| Author: | duniek [ 22 Feb 2010, 01:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
OK this is an idea 5x 1680x1050 in portarit mode so 5250x1680 res one 5xxx gpu + display port adapter @ dvi so I will have 3 dvi on gpu + to three DVI matrox triplehead2go from one dvi from gpu card so from one card I can make 5 monitors in theory works but practice? anyone tried :D? //edit OR 3 to 5xxx a+ eyefinity and 2 to second gpu @ softTH so I will get 5040x1050 + 2x 1680x1050 on sides |
|
| Author: | DaFox [ 22 Feb 2010, 02:18 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
:?: |
|
| Author: | duniek [ 22 Feb 2010, 02:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
matrox triplehead2go + soft TH works (I saw movie on youtube yestareday) guy has 5 x screens on matrox 3 as 1 in extended mode and 2 on sides so system saw 3 physical monitors only - |side| |main| |side| so matrox + sofTH works, so in theory eyefinity + softth should works too but I think I will be pionier in this , need only to wait for active dp @ dvi adapter |
|
| Author: | BHawthorne [ 22 Feb 2010, 04:49 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
matrox triplehead2go + soft TH works (I saw movie on youtube yestareday) I was the original person to initiall do Th2G+SoftTH. I can tell you right now Portrait mode won't work on Th2G. Your theory will work up to 8000 or 8192 pixels wide total but not wider. On the other hand, EyeFinity on 3 screens portrait and SoftTH for the outside 2 "might" work. You'll have to be the first to do it like I did with Th2G a few years ago. There always has to be someone to take the first step with exotic display configurations. Personally, I'd just wait for the 5870 EyeFinity6 six port card to come to market. Keep it simple, don't limit yourself by using something obscure. EyeFinity+SoftTH is way too obscure to get proper support with anything. |
|
| Author: | duniek [ 22 Feb 2010, 11:19 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
dont have dp @ dvi adapter yet so I will try quad lcd @ 6720x1050 to test |1680x1050| + |3360x1050| + |1680+1050| |
|
| Author: | duniek [ 22 Feb 2010, 12:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
quad setup WORKS
|
|
| Author: | BHawthorne [ 22 Feb 2010, 21:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
quad setup WORKS Ofcourse it works, it's under 8k pixel width. :wink: Here is 7680x1200 I did in 2008: 
|
|
| Author: | Lebedev [ 23 Feb 2010, 04:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
looks awesome, but for shooters with crosshair a setup with odd-number monitors is recommended i think, don't you? Race-simulators should be fine :D |
|
| Author: | BHawthorne [ 23 Feb 2010, 04:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
looks awesome, but for shooters with crosshair a setup with odd-number monitors is recommended i think, don't you? Yes, even number display count bezel placement is awkward. :wink: I'm just itching to see 5x portrait setup working in EyeFinity6. It would be my ideal non-projector based setup. |
|
| Author: | duniek [ 25 Feb 2010, 17:42 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 8400 x 1050 possibility? |
8400x1050 @ DX9 WORKS :mrgreen: :rockout 
|
|
| Page 2 of 6 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|