Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 22 Dec 2024, 16:21

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 09:03 
Offline

Joined: 05 Dec 2007, 08:54
Posts: 78
Hey everyone. Just found out that the new ati cards don't require a triplehead2go for multiple monitors.
Here's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3jpG3rv4zI a video of Microsoft Flight sim w/8 monitors hooked up to 4x38xx ati's. More info: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=475&pgno=8
Anyway, I am going to get a second 3870 eventually(waiting for my first one now), or maybe a 3870x2 when it comes out for 3 total gpu's w/my x38 board. Anyway, thought I'd share my findings while doing my own research.


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 10:01 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2004, 17:42
Posts: 3436
Hasn't MS Flight Simulator always done multi monitor by running the game in a windows or multiple windows ?

... and so as far as I know it is nothing new with these new cards ... :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 15:49 
Offline

Joined: 21 Apr 2006, 17:17
Posts: 643
Yep, MSFS has always supported this, which is where that crazy picture of one version running on 11 or 13 monitors comes from.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 16:46 
Offline

Joined: 28 Feb 2007, 15:34
Posts: 104
Indeed, this kind of setup would be nice for a game that natively supports the connection of more than one independent monitor. However for the majority of games (that only support a single independent display/frame buffer) this "Spider Setup" wouldn't give the same immersive effect that you achieve with a TripleHead2Go because you'd only be able to take advantage of one display output.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 17:49 
Offline

Joined: 05 Dec 2007, 08:54
Posts: 78
Indeed, this kind of setup would be nice for a game that natively supports the connection of more than one independent monitor. However for the majority of games (that only support a single independent display/frame buffer) this "Spider Setup" wouldn't give the same immersive effect that you achieve with a TripleHead2Go because you'd only be able to take advantage of one display output.


That is INCORRECT. Did anyone read the link I posted besides the flight sim one? Here it is again: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=475&pgno=8
It's not just for ms flight sim! This is a standard feature now on the new cards.





WIth the previous gen ati cards, this wasn't possible.[/img]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 18:00 
Offline

Joined: 21 Apr 2006, 17:17
Posts: 643
That is INCORRECT. Did anyone read the link I posted besides the flight sim one? Here it is again: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=475&pgno=8
It's not just for ms flight sim! This is a standard feature now on the new cards.
I see nothing in there that supports your point. Your link says Alternatively, you can use the four graphics cards to display out to 8 monitors. Yes, it is now possible to play Microsoft Flight Simulator on eight monitors should you be rich enough to afford the whole setup.

It still specifically mention MSFS, and we know that that has been possible for a long time. And of course 8 monitors are possible - that's also been quite possible for a long time. What isn't possible is gaming on 8 monitors, i.e. outputting to a single frame buffer and splitting that image 8 (or more than three) ways, for many game titles.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 18:10 
Offline

Joined: 05 Dec 2007, 08:54
Posts: 78
[quote]That is INCORRECT. Did anyone read the link I posted besides the flight sim one? Here it is again: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=475&pgno=8
It's not just for ms flight sim! This is a standard feature now on the new cards.
I see nothing in there that supports your point. Your link says Alternatively, you can use the four graphics cards to display out to 8 monitors. Yes, it is now possible to play Microsoft Flight Simulator on eight monitors should you be rich enough to afford the whole setup.

It still specifically mention MSFS, and we know that that has been possible for a long time. And of course 8 monitors are possible - that's also been quite possible for a long time. What isn't possible is gaming on 8 monitors, i.e. outputting to a single frame buffer and splitting that image 8 (or more than three) ways, for many game titles.

It says it's POSSIBLE w/ms flight sim. It doesn't say "This feature only works with specific games" anywhere. ATI isn't gonna invest all this time and money for multiple monitor gaming just so people can play MS flight sim on their cards. It says "Multiple monitor gaming" and "new EXTENDED MONITOR and Profile features". Not MS flight sim only. However many DVI ports you have w/you new ati card/cards, is how many monitors you can plug in and span them across up-to 8 monitors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 18:17 
Offline

Joined: 05 Dec 2007, 08:54
Posts: 78
http://multicore.amd.com/us-en/AMD-Multi-Core/Quad-Core-Advantage/Spider.aspx "up to 8 monitors".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 18:33 
Offline

Joined: 21 Apr 2006, 17:17
Posts: 643
I'd like to believe you, I really would. I just don't see enough supporting evidence.

You can connect 8 monitors or more to a system with 4 GeForce 2 cards if you want; with Windows XP a many-monitor environment is completely possible and has been for a long time. Presumably the same is true for Vista. What Spider gives us is the ability to drive those monitors with 4 PCI-E GPUs, which previously has not been possible because there have been no motherboards with 4 PCI-E x16 slots.

If ATI has developed a Crossfire system that will allow 3D output to 8 monitors, that's fantastic. But the sketchy information leads me to believe that they haven't done that. The very fact that the capability is advertised using MSFS leads me to my skepticism. If ATI really has done something very cool here, they need to make a much bigger deal out of it so people aren't left guessing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2007, 18:33 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders

Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 23:22
Posts: 223
http://multicore.amd.com/us-en/AMD-Multi-Core/Quad-Core-Advantage/Spider.aspx "up to 8 monitors".


Granted, the ad is clearly ambiguous at best. However... there is, as you know, a fundamental difference between supporting multi-monitor output and spanning a game over multi-monitors.

If you had a new ability to SPAN a game over multiple monitors (ala TH2Go), would you only trumpet MSFS; a game that is DESIGNED to span multi-monitors.... or would you be showing screens with WoW, Crysis, Gears of War, CoD4 and all the other huge FPS games that would make users buy these cards in droves??

Based upon the totality of the evidence at this point, I think the most reasonable conclusion is that the functionality is not the same as the TH2Go.... but I do hope I am wrong.

It is nothing but good for us TripleHead gamers than to have more and more acceptance of the concept of triplehead gaming move more into the mainstream.

_________________
Gigabyte GTX 980 - SLI

i7-4770k @4ghz

16GB Ram

Planar SA2311W 3D Vision monitors (x3)

Windows 7 x64 Ultimate SP1


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yandex [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group