Widescreen Gaming Forum http://www.wsgf.org/phpBB3/ |
|
EYEFINITY 9 - 9x1 portrait/landscape and 3x3 monitor setup http://www.wsgf.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=19970 |
Page 2 of 6 |
Author: | duniek [ 13 Jun 2010, 01:25 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
I wonder how wide you would have to make something to get a 360 view. I wondering about that from begining of the universe lol tommorow maybe I will try 9x1 landscape so will see how wide is fov on 14,4:1 ratio :D |
Author: | r3v3nant [ 13 Jun 2010, 05:27 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
crazy dude.. and full of awesome. |
Author: | noquarter [ 13 Jun 2010, 08:18 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
So if you had one of these 7 PCI-e slot mobos and 7 5870 E6 cards you could have 42 monitors.. uhm. 7x5 setup would be the best? (35 monitors) |
Author: | duniek [ 13 Jun 2010, 12:05 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
So if you had one of these 7 PCI-e slot mobos and 7 5870 E6 cards you could have 42 monitors.. uhm. 7x5 setup would be the best? (35 monitors) nope SoftTH can run only 3 monitors max (3 groups) so 3x hd5870 e6 cards and I can run 9x2 setup or 15x1 portrait (but after ATI release their drivers which can support 5x1 mode) |
Author: | Lebedev [ 13 Jun 2010, 13:19 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
I wonder what's the maximum? |
Author: | Delphium [ 13 Jun 2010, 14:15 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
Close, however unfortunately we all know that the TH2G will only output 5040x1050 (a max of 1680x1050 per screen). As such you may be able to get... Landscape: 27x 1680 = 45,360 pixels wide by 1050 pixels tall With an aspect ratio of 216:5 or Portrait: 27x 1050 = 28,350 pixels wide by 1680 pixels tall With an aspect ratio of 135:8 Still thats pritty danm wide. It may be possible to expand on this using 3x E6 cards with a TH2G on each port, bringing the total number of monitors to 54. |
Author: | Lebedev [ 13 Jun 2010, 14:31 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
Close, however unfortunately we all know that the TH2G will only output 5050x1050 (a max of 1680x1050 per screen). uhm, yeah i forgot... but this resolution-limit should (theoretically) be abandoned with displayport :( |
Author: | suiken_2mieu [ 13 Jun 2010, 15:14 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
[quote]Close, however unfortunately we all know that the TH2G will only output 5050x1050 (a max of 1680x1050 per screen). uhm, yeah i forgot... but this resolution-limit should (theoretically) be abandoned with displayport :( Actually with a 5000 series card, the max output with a TH2Go is 3840x1024. Sucks don't it? Also, DP1.1 doesn't allow for much more bandwidth for higher resolutions. 1.2 is where we can do interesting stuff. You can run 3x2560x1440 displays at 60Hz and 3x2560x1600 displays at 58Hz with DP1.2 and Resolution Bandwidth Calculator |
Author: | duniek [ 13 Jun 2010, 15:32 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
theoretically 3x 5870 e6 = 18 video outputs + each th2go = 54 monitors in 27x2 mode so 45360x2100 res = 95mln pixel and I will get 0,0001FPS in dirt2 |
Author: | suiken_2mieu [ 13 Jun 2010, 15:38 ] |
Post subject: | Re: 9x1 portrait mode on |
theoretically Actually, because of the the limitation of the ATI driver: 3x 5870 e6 = 18 video outputs + each th2go = 54 monitors in 27x2 mode so 34560x2048 res = 71mln pixel This is completely ridiculous, but awesome, now who want to tally up how much all that display hardware would cost? Also Duniek, update your sig. You're doing amazing things here. |
Page 2 of 6 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |