Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 06 Oct 2024, 19:25

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 12 Feb 2010, 03:50 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Posts: 2351
Location: Virginia
hahaha this is excellent, I was wondering how I was supposed to get good frame rates at 5760x2160 (I'm working on getting a 3x2 setup). I'm sure 3840x1440 will be sweet enough. Plus I might be able to get 3D working with the lower resolution (it need to render the frame twice to do this.)

_________________
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 13 Feb 2010, 20:48 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Posts: 2351
Location: Virginia
so does anyone one the intermediate resolution for 1080 panels?

_________________
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Feb 2010, 21:51 
Offline

Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 23:45
Posts: 41
so does anyone one the intermediate resolution for 1080 panels?


i pray to the lord they support 720p...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2010, 04:08 
Offline

Joined: 08 Dec 2009, 05:39
Posts: 105
I believe that 4320*900 was the intermediate option available when I had 10.1 installed with my 1920*1080 monitors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2010, 04:16 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Posts: 2351
Location: Virginia
I believe that 4320*900 was the intermediate option available when I had 10.1 installed with my 1920*1080 monitors.

wtf, that's a 3x16:10 resolution. :doh

4800x900 would be much better

_________________
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2010, 04:58 
Offline

Joined: 08 Dec 2009, 05:39
Posts: 105
I'd have to double check, but I do remember it looking 'off'. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2010, 05:21 
Offline

Joined: 08 Dec 2009, 05:39
Posts: 105
yeah, my bad, 4800*900 it is...





Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2010, 05:44 
Offline

Joined: 25 Nov 2006, 04:14
Posts: 54
Can we mix landscape and portrait modes yet ? ( ie dell 3007 in landscape with 2 20" monitors in portrait" )


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2010, 07:10 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2009, 04:20
Posts: 2351
Location: Virginia
Can we mix landscape and portrait modes yet ? ( ie dell 3007 in landscape with 2 20" monitors in portrait" )

No. This is on the backburner for a while.

_________________
System Core: | Intel Core i5-2500K + ASUS P8Z68-V + 16GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 MHz | Win7 x64 | MSI R7970 Lightning 3GB [1105/1400] |
Display: | 3 x Dell Ultrasharp 3007WFP-HC @ 7680x1600 | Dell u3011 |


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Feb 2010, 21:32 
Offline

Joined: 30 Oct 2009, 19:20
Posts: 177
If anyone else is using 22" eyefinity 1680 x 1050 x3 and would like to see 4320 x 900 as the intermediate resolution instead of the current 3840 x 800 please ask on the Catalyst Crew Feedback Program http://www.amd.com/us/CatalystCrewSurvey if enough people request this they might change it.

This is what I sent
Code:
In 10.1 and above the eyefinity resolutions were adjusted so that the aspect ratio is maintained.
   
   24" 1920 x 1200 monitors received 5040 x 1050 as an intermediate resolution based on the next step down 1680 x 1050 which is good.
   
   I have 22" eyefinity though and we received 3840 x 800 as our intermediate resolution which is two steps down.  Can this be changed to 4320 x 900 which would be based on 1440 x 900 which is the next step down.
   
   Although 3840 x 800 maintains the aspect ratio you lose a lot of resolution 4320 x 900 would be much nicer and it still maintains the aspect ratio.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group