You're forgetting that the argument was based on how easily they could afford their games, since that's what you were implying. Having a $300 video card does not automatically mean you can easily afford the games.
But it does mean they can easily afford games. It doesn't necessarily mean they can afford them every month, but they can afford games in general. That alone makes the "they pirate because they can't afford games" excuse bunk.
I mentioned once a month because it's a more accurate representation than a few games a year, esp for someone with a dedicated gaming rig.
Nevertheless, it's completely at odds with the "they pirate games because they can't afford them" excuse.
OMG, no wonder you seem to unconditionally support Cliffy, you sound like his yes man press agent. Now it's not only anyone with a high end gaming rig, any kids with dedicated gaming rigs living at home with their parents are automatically pirates too.
Once again, you are seeing sweeping generalizations where there aren't any. I said "lots of kids." Repeat. "Lots of kids." Not "any kids." Kindly re-calibrate your scrutiny machine.
As someone on the other side, This is very correct. I saved up for 5 years for this PC
Then if you still have income, you can save up for a game too, and therefore can afford games. Just because you can't have a game every month doesn't mean you can't afford games. I can't have a new game every month either.
Might I add that Option B and C would actually be worse for game developers.
C isn't worse for game developers. Game devs don't make any extra money when you max out their games.
Cliff made a generalization. Generalizations are frequently ambiguous.
His generalization was that high-end gamers know how to pirate. There's nothing at all ambiguous about this generalization - he says that you know how to pirate, and so does everyone else with high end equipment. Nothing more, nothing less.
I think the bottom line is that we simply perceive Cliff's statement in different ways.
Perceiving is one thing. Making a grievous accusation based on a perception is another.
In this case, Cliffy made a sweeping public statement which has made himself look like a roostersmoker (the paultry type, as in a cock) by implying whether on purpose or not (who cares) that the enthusiasts are pirates.
Again, he did not imply this. Perhaps certain vocal message board users perceived it to be this way, but the most his words imply is that *lots* of the enthusiasts are pirates.
The public has reacted
But what did the public react to precisely? As far as I can tell, few of the public even read his statements - they just clicked on topic titles that say "CliffyB is calling you a pirate and personally blames you for PC gaming's decline and global warming" and made up their minds that he was a tool without even seeing his words in their original context.